Skip to content
← All work
BeautyItalyPlaceholder Beauty Co.

Rebuilt the offer and the product pages before touching the ad account.

2.1×

contribution margin in 90 days

Beauty brand case study visual

A skincare brand doing solid top-line revenue and almost no profit. The founder was convinced the media buying was broken. It wasn't — the account was competent. The money was leaking somewhere the dashboards don't show.

  • 01A hero offer that competed on discount, so every new customer arrived expecting the next discount.
  • 02Product pages that listed ingredients instead of answering the one fear the customer actually had.
  • 03Zero post-purchase flows — the second order was left entirely to chance.
  • 04Creatives that all said the same thing in a slightly different font.

Bucket first. Then the tap.

01

Reframed the offer around a first-result guarantee instead of a discount.

02

Rewrote the two top landing pages around the buyer's real objection.

03

Built the core email + SMS flows (welcome, abandonment, post-purchase, winback).

04

Only then rebuilt the Meta testing structure — three angles, one variable per test.

Placeholder figures — pending client sign-off.

2.1×
−34%
+41%
The insight, not the settings screen.

The winning ad wasn't the prettiest one. It was the one that named the exact moment she felt self-conscious. We only found it because the test was built to isolate the message, not the aesthetics.

Want to know where your money leaks?

Apply for your free auditTakes 2 minutes. Costs nothing. Might sting a little.